Morpho price

Reporting an exploit to [@Balancer]. As a simple yield farmer, I think contract risk is something we can't avoid, but I want to talk about actions taken to try to reduce that risk, even if just a little. 1. A structure never seen before > It's like I'm testing with my own money. 2. Auto-compounding > I can compound myself, there's no reason to go through another contract. 3. Leveraging yield protocols > Especially since the yields in the DeFi market have been decreasing significantly recently, leveraging and looping have become excessive to squeeze out those yields, even if that's the right thing to do, it's better for me to track the wallets of those protocols rather than putting my money into such leveraged yield protocols. Personally, I always consider extreme scenarios, for example, when there was news that Euler would add a new feature using the liquidity of Lending for Euler Swap, I prayed that nothing would happen, and I still do. Also, a recent story influenced by my favorite extreme scenario involves plasma and stablecoins. The fact that I was able to push a seed close to a full seed into Plasma Pre-deposit was simply because my assets were deposited in Aave. However, even if there is some leeway in the cap for Stable Pre-deposit, the reason I don't want to do a full seed is because they are already constructing money legos. As the contracts get more intertwined, it's natural that the risk increases. And when it comes to Aave and Morpho, it's obvious that I would trust Aave more. In fact, from the very beginning, I couldn't put a full seed into Concrete, so I only deposited a portion. No, to be precise, I wanted to put in more but couldn't, but I had no intention of putting in a full seed. The reason I trust Aave over Morpho is that, even setting aside whether Morpho's contracts are safe, curation should also be seen as a risk. Looking at the current issues with the ongoing Stream, I could use the example of the Telos curator vault that allocated a large amount of funds to the Stream vault in Plasma Euler. I'm essentially entrusting my money to the curator's fund management strategy, Telos allocated a high percentage of funds to the Stream, and when the bank run issue arose due to this Stream issue, the USDT of the depositors got stuck. Stable is with Morpho, but the funds that went into the Pre-deposit were moved to a vault managed by the @gauntlet_xyz Curator. It is allocated there, and it's possible to track which vault the funds are allocated to. Most of it is not allocated to risky funds, but regardless, my deposited funds are managed by the curator's decisions, which can change in the future regardless of my own decisions. Of course, Aave also has collateral added and removed and fluctuates, but since it's not a single decision by the curator team, it proceeds through governance, so I can at least know in advance what collateral is added where. In my personal opinion, Plasma's Aave may have been used in the USDe Loop, but I can't shake the feeling that Morpho is a little riskier than Aave. Personally, I'm not someone who knows contracts professionally, so I tend to follow scenarios when depositing funds in DeFi. Even if tier-one audit firms that audit contracts as their main job have audited it, it's still DeFi, and things can go wrong. For example, the Balancer that was exploited today had a lot of audits from tier-one audit firms, yet it ultimately got exploited. The audit was quite some time ago, and I haven't tracked whether it was a newly added (not audited) contract after the audit or if the problem occurred in a contract that passed the audit, but the point is that there is risk no matter where you use it. Conclusion: When will the secondary deposit for Stable be released?